52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks Final Prompt: Resolutions

 

My 2021 Research Resolutions

 

I have just completed my second year of Amy Johnson Crow’s 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks challenge, and it was a success—I completed 57 blog posts in 2020 that related some important and fascinating pieces of family history. And I had a blast researching and writing them.

So my first resolution for 2021 is to join the 2021 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks program. I can’t wait to see what I discover next year, and how I can craft those discoveries into interesting blog posts for my family. I hope to complete all 52 weeks just as I was able to do this year.

My second resolution is to expand my research from just my family to my husband’s family as well. I hope to alternate crafting posts about his ancestors with those about my ancestors. There are some fascinating characters in his family tree, and I need to record some of those stories.

My third resolution is to do more work preserving family photos and letters. I need to work on scanning the originals in my files, converting them to digital files that can be shared by family members. As 2020 has shown all of us, we don’t know how much time any of us has, so I had better ensure these items are accessible to others in our family.

And my fourth and final family history resolution is to do more work transcribing my 9^th great grandfather Francis Dane’s Commonplace Book. I am eager to understand more of what he recorded nearly 400 years ago in the early years of Andover, Massachusetts.

Due to COVID and the stay-at-home orders, 2020 turned out to be a very productive year for my genealogical research. I hope that 2021 is equally productive, but also finds us able to return to our normal lives as soon as vaccinations can reach all Americans.  

Goodbye, 2020. On to a more healthy and happy 2021.   

Jerome Dane and the Dakota War of 1862: 52 Ancestors Prompt “Witness to History”

Captain Jerome Dane, the Minnesota Ninth Regiment Company E and the “Sioux Uprising”

Jerome Dane: 1828-1908

 

            My brother-in-law recently contacted me after listening to a public radio program about the Dakota War of 1862 and the mass hanging in Mankato, Minnesota of 38 men from the Dakota tribe, the largest mass execution in American history. Knowing that I grew up just miles from Mankato, he wondered if I had ever heard of this tragic event. Oh, yes, I responded. I am very familiar with the Dakota War and the hangings in Mankato. I had learned about it as a child, when the war was referred to as the “Sioux Uprising.” But I was more familiar with it because my second-great-grandfather, Captain Jerome Dane, fought in the war and commanded one of the units that provided security at the execution. He was an eyewitness to a sad and ugly piece of history.

Captain Jerome Dane--1863 Civil War Photo courtesy of Minnesota Hist. Society

           The Dakota War of 1862 began in August of that year. The government had, as usual, reneged on the terms of treaties signed with the Dakota tribes, pushing them off their lands to make room for settlers and leaving the Dakota desperate and starving. After some young Dakota men were involved in a violent confrontation with some settlers, the Dakota went to war, attacking the mostly European immigrants who were homesteading in southern Minnesota. Over the next few months, somewhere between 400 and 800 settlers were killed, including women and children. The lightly defended forts in the area of the uprising, including Fort Ridgley near New Ulm, received reinforcements from the Minnesota Volunteer infantry units, which had been forming in response to the Civil War. The infantry units eventually defeated the Dakota people, leading to their expulsion from Minnesota and the horrific mass hanging in Mankato on December 26, 1862.

            Jerome Dane was born March 3, 1828 in Genesee, New York. His father died when he was only seven, and times were difficult for his mother and siblings. When he was a young man, Jerome and his brothers moved westward in search of a better life. They first settled in Wisconsin, where Jerome married a young woman from Wisconsin, Mary Jane Mills, in 1853. Jerome was then 25 years old. At some point in the later 1850s, Jerome moved his young family to southern Minnesota, settling in Blue Earth County not far from Mankato, where he took up farming.

            Jerome was also interested in the military life. He had served as a lieutenant in a militia, so when it was time to begin recruiting Minnesota men to serve in the Civil War, Jerome volunteered and was commissioned as a Captain in the Minnesota 9^th Infantry. Since he lived near Mankato, he was placed in command of Company E, which was being formed there. When the Dakota War began, this new unit was close to hand and were sent by to defend the German community of New Ulm about twenty miles distant.

The town of New Ulm was then the largest city in that part of Minnesota, with 900 residents. As terrified settlers fled the Dakota, the town’s population ballooned to nearly 2000. It was a repeated target of attacks by the native fighters, and over the course of several weeks nearly 190 structures in the city were burned. The town was evacuated at least once, but residents returned and came under attack again.

Attack on New Ulm: 1904 Oil Painting by New Ulm artist Anton Gag

Judge Charles Flandreau had been placed in charge of the defense of the area, and he reported that in early September, “Enough citizens of New Ulm had returned home to form two companies at that point; Company E of the Ninth Regiment, under Capt. Jerome E. Dane, was stationed at Crisp's farm, about half way between New Ulm and South Bend.”

Another history of the war states, “Company E under Captain Jerome Dane, was temporarily mounted on horses and stationed at New Ulm. Later Company F, of the Eighth Regiment, under Captain Leonard Aldrich, was sent to New Ulm, relieving Captain Dane’s company, which was then stationed at Crisp’s Farm, half way between New Ulm and South Bend.”

Settlers escaping the violence 1862 by photographer Adrian J. Ebell 

During his patrols with Company E, Captain Dane discovered the corpses of settlers killed by the Indians and helped to rescue and protect survivors. Of course the press was greatly interested in the war, and wildly lurid stories began to be published, claiming that people were nailed to fences and mutilated. Captain Dane apparently proved to be source of colorful—and perhaps exaggerated—copy for eager reporters. As reported by Gary Clayton Anderson in his book Massacre in Minnesota,

“Captain E. Jerome Dane rescued the Lake Shetek survivors, including Lavina Eastlick, Smith, Bentley, Everett and the others on August 26. A month later, as the story regarding the fence incident escalated in the press, Dane gave his version of it to George W. Doud, apparently on September 25. One young girl, Doud later reported, ‘was fastened to the side of a house by driving nails through her feet and her head was downward.’ Another young ‘lady was found scalped and all her garments were gone and both of her breasts were cut off.’ Finally a woman ‘soon to be a mother’ had her baby cut from the womb, ‘her offspring had been severed from her and an owl was deposited in its stead.’”

Lavina Eastlick and sons, Lake Shetek survivors protected by Dane's unit--Lavina had been shot three times and beaten; her husband and middle child killed.

Doud’s lurid details were apparently based in part on Captain Dane’s supposed eye witness testimony. Other witnesses call Dane’s testimony into doubt. Burial parties reported the bodies they buried—who admittedly were not the people Dane saw-- had been shot or stabbed; no mutilation. Why would Dane have lied? Did he hope to further inflame sentiment against the Dakota? Or was he merely eager for publicity and so chose to confirm the crazy stories that already existed? Or did he actually witness the atrocities as reported by Doud? We will never know for certain.

By December 1862, the captured Dakota warriors were convicted of murder and sentenced to hang. President Lincoln commuted the sentences of some 200 Dakota, but let the death sentences of the remaining 38 men stand. Nearly 4,000 people gathered in Mankato to witness the execution. Several infantry companies, including Captain Dane’s Company E, were assigned to provide security, to control the angry crowds. Confirmation of this comes from the National Park Service’s Civil War records, which state:

“ Company "E" organized at Mankato and duty there; at Lake Crystal, Judson, till April, 1863. Present as guard at hanging of Indians at Mankato December 26, 1862. Mustered in November 14, 1862. Frontier post service at Hutchinson, Forest City, Long Lake and Pipe Lake till September, 1863.”

Scaffolds in Mankato surrounded by Infantry Units including Dane's Company E. Artist W. H. Child, original at Library of Congress

            I wonder what Captain Dane felt when he saw the gigantic gallows in Mankato for the first time. I hope he felt some pity for the 38 Dakota men when the mechanism was triggered and they all dropped to their deaths at once. However, fear and anger ran high among the residents of southern Minnesota who had lost so many friends, neighbors and family, so I suspect he felt the deaths by hanging and the expulsion of the Dakota people from the state were justified.

Painting of the December 1862 Execution by J. Thullen, courtesy of Minn. Historical Assn.

            As the Civil War records note, Jerome’s Company E spent the next year providing frontier post protection in southern Minnesota before they were sent to the front in the Civil War. Jerome would go on to witness more cruel and violent incidents in American history before he was able to return home to his farm in 1865.

Sources:

Minnesota In Three Centuries, 1655-1908: Description And Explorations, By W. Upham. Lucius Frederick Hubbard, William Pitt Murray, James Heaton Baker. Pg. 377.

Encyclopedia of Biography of Minnesota, History of Minnesota by Judge Charles E. Flandreau, 1900, transcribed by Mary Kay Krogman. http://genealogytrails.com/minn/history_militia.html

“Union Minnesota Volunteers: 9^th Regiment Minnesota Infantry”.  https://www.nps.gov/civilwar/search-battle-units-detail.htm?battleUnitCode=UMN0009RI

Massacre in Minnesota: The Dakota War of 1862, the Most Violent Ethnic Conflict in American History, Gary Clayton Anderson. University of Oklahoma Press. Oct. 17, 2019.

http://www.dakotavictims1862.com/Family_and_Friends_of_Dakota_Uprising/Newspaper_Articles_of_Settler_Stories.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dakota_War_of_1862

Ivan Macbeth’s Good Deed Goes Awry: 52 Ancestors 2020 Prompt “Good Deeds”

Playing Santa at the One-Room School in the 1930s: Unintended Consequences

Ivan Macbeth: 1904-1972

 

My mother, Ione Macbeth Peterson, told a marvelous story about how her father’s good deed in the mid-1930s went sadly awry, crushing her childhood Christmas dreams.

My mother was born in 1928 to Nora Hoffman Macbeth and Ivan Macbeth. Ione attended a one-room school, the Tivoli School in Blue Earth County, Minnesota. One December during her early elementary years, her teacher asked to talk to her after school. She wanted my mother to ask her father to do a favor for the school.

My mother obediently remained behind as the other children left and started their walks home in the chill Minnesota afternoon. Her teacher gave her a message for her father, both written and verbal, asking him to dress up to play Santa Claus for the school Christmas party, which was coming up in a week or so.

My mother couldn’t remember what she said to the teacher. She couldn’t remember the long, cold walk home. She was stunned. How could her father be Santa Claus? My mother, despite being nearly nine years old, still believed in Santa Claus. Now her world was crushed. She realized adults had lied to her. LIED. They had told her Santa brought her presents on Christmas. They had told her he rode through the sky on Christmas night in a sleigh pulled by reindeer, and that he stopped at the house of every child to bring the good ones gifts and the bad ones lumps of coal. They had told her Santa was real. And she had believed them, because they were her parents. Because they were adults, and adults were the source of facts and knowledge.

Ione Macbeth 8th Birthday

When she arrived home and relayed the message to her parents, and also expressed her confusion and feelings of betrayal, her parents laughed. They had assumed she had already figured out that Santa was a lovely Christmas fiction, and that she’d just been playing along as most children do, pretending to believe the last couple years. Their laughter just hurt my mother even more.

She recalled that her father did a good job as Santa. He had been pleased to be asked and was happy to do the job for the school—he saw it as his Christmas good deed. 

Ivan and Ione as a toddler on the Macbeth Farm--1930

Ivan Macbeth was a slender man, so she was amazed that he looked quite fat in the costume, and that his face was nearly unrecognizable under the full white beard. She remembers staring and staring at him, wondering how she had ever believed the school Santa was real—now that she knew who was beneath the padding and red clothes and black boots, it was so obvious that Santa was just a father in a costume, and that different fathers had played the role in years past.

As an adult, my mother recalled that for years after she remained mistrustful of adults. “If they could lie about Santa Claus, they could lie about anything,” she said. And when she had her own children, she refused to pretend that gifts came from Santa. She always made sure we saw her putting the gifts under the tree—there were no Christmas lies for my brother and me.

Blizzard of 1917: 52 Ancestors 2020 Prompt “Winter”

 

A Brutal February the Year My Father Was Born

 

            I wasn’t sure how to approach the 52 Ancestors “Winter” prompt until I ran across a vintage photo on Ebay from my hometown of Hanska. It was labeled “Hanska Blizzard Feb. 1917”.  It depicted a roadway with 2 wagon tracks in sharp black running down the snowy middle of the road. The roadway had been cleared of a large drift that had covered the road. Snow drifts formed walls flanking the road. I could just imagine the force of the wind that whipped up such enormous drifts, and the amount of labor—most by hand in 1917—that would have been required to make the road passable.

            My father, Juhl Peterson, was born August 1, 1917, so his mother would have been pregnant with him when this blizzard struck. I decided to do some research on the event. I discovered that the blizzard, one of six that battered Minnesota that February, wasn’t the worst of the winter problems residents faced. Here is a passage from an article by Mark Seeley in the 2017 issue of Farm Progress, titled, “February 1917: The Heart of a Brutal Winter”:

“The winter of 1916-17 was one of the cruelest in state history for a number of reasons. It started early, with widespread snow and cold blanketing the state by mid-October. From there, the cold became more intense and the snowfall more frequent. Over the three winter months — December through February — temperatures around the state averaged from 9 to 12 degrees F cooler than normal, and many climate stations reported extreme low temperatures ranging from -30 to -40 degrees F.

Some climate observers reported 12 to 15 days with morning low temperatures of -30 degrees F or colder. Seasonal snowfall accumulations in many areas were record-setting, ranging from 65 to 99 inches.

In the middle of this winter, the month of February brought persistent and extreme cold. The month started with 110 consecutive hours of below-zero degrees F temperature readings, finally rising above 0 degrees F on the afternoon of Feb. 5. For many areas of the state, only four nights brought low temperatures that remained above 0 degrees F. The only two days during the month with above-normal temperatures were Feb. 15 and 16. Monthly average temperatures from Minnesota climate stations ranged from 12 to 16 degrees F colder than normal. At the time, February 1917 was the coldest in state history, with an average statewide temperature value that was subzero in most places.

This magnitude of February cold was not surpassed until 1936. As the month closed, climate observers noted that lake ice was extremely thick, ranging from 20 to 40 inches in thickness. Many well pumps froze up, causing rural residents to harvest and thaw ice for water supply. There was little let up from the cold until March 20, when temperatures rose above 40 degrees F.

During February 1917, six blizzards crossed the state, mostly affecting northern and western counties. Snowfall totals exceeded 20 inches in many places, and snow depth exceeded 2 feet in most areas of the state.

During the first half of the month, these blizzard conditions blocked railroads for many days and caused many school closures. Farmers also reported some livestock losses associated with these storms.”

All I could think about was my grandmother Regina Peterson, then 45 years old and pregnant with what would be the last of her nine children, in a tiny house, probably no more than 900 square feet and with perhaps four rooms, trying to keep her family warm in those brutal temperatures.

Paul and Regina's small farmhouse circa 1917

The family couldn’t stay huddled by the stove or fireplace all day and night; farm work still had to be done. I don’t think the house had running water yet—they were still forced to pump well water. If the well froze over, they would have been melting snow to get water. The wood they needed to burn to keep the house warm would have been stored outside. The windows would have been single-paned and would have been drafty when the wind howled outside. The farm animals still had to be cared for—grain measured out, hay forked into pens in the barn, and water tanks cleared of ice. The work was hard and the family would have only had woolen clothing and leather gloves and boots to wear as they worked, possibly fur coats if they had them. I am amazed no one lost fingers or toes to frostbite given the extreme cold. The windchill would have been even more numbingly cold.

Paul and Regina Peterson on their wedding day

Reading about this horrible winter makes me admire my grandparents and uncles and aunts even more. They had to deal with the worst of nature without the tools we take for granted now—county snowplows to plow the roads, efficient furnaces and well-insulated homes to keep us warm when temperatures drop, and innovative fabrics like down coats, thinsulate gloves, and insulated boots. They were strong, determined people—true pioneer stock.

Sources:

https://www.farmprogress.com/weather/february-1917-heart-brutal-        minnesota-winter ; February 1917: The Heart of a Brutal Winter. Mark Seeley. Farm Progress. Jan. 4, 2017.

Rev. Francis Dane’s Commonplace Book: 52 Ancestors 2020 Prompt “Gratitude”

 

Rev. Francis Dane’s Poem Fragment on Gratitude

 

In my previous post, I wrote about the difficulties of transcribing my tenth great-grandfather’s Commonplace Book. Rev. Francis Dane, the first minister of Andover, Massachusetts, wrote in the book over a forty year period. He used it to make notes, compose poetry and hymns, and draft sermons and letters. One poem fragment I discovered dealt with the topic of gratitude. I have tried to transcribe it below. Any misspellings are copied from the original text:

 “And tell you that my gratefull mind

Do render thanks as much in kind.

Take in g. part this small return now

Though for me yet sure my love doth bestow.

But if I wholley silent were

And after all shouts still forbear,

Then justly you might count me rude

And charge me with ingratitude.”

 I know that I have made some mistakes, particularly in lines three and four, which were damaged and scarcely legible. However, the basic meaning and intent of the poem is clear: that he feels grateful but has trouble expressing his gratitude, which may cause others to judge him as rude and ungrateful.

I find the poetry in the book to be quite charming. It is rough and uneven in meter, so I don’t believe he was copying the works of others, but was composing his own poems. I love getting a glimpse into the mind of this fascinating ancestor of mine.

Image 146: Complete page containing Gratitude poem.

I too am grateful—grateful that this book survived nearly four hundred years, and that the NEHGS generously posted the scans of the book’s pages online for all to access without charge. What a wonderful gift to Rev. Dane’s many descendants, as well as to historians studying early colonial life.

Transcribing Francis Dane’s Commonplace Book: 52 Ancestors 2020 Prompt “Different Language”

 

A Very Different English Language: Transcribing Rev. Francis Dane’s 17^th Century Prose

Francis Dane: 1615-1697

 

My tenth great-grandfather, Rev. Francis Dane, was a significant figure in colonial Massachusetts. In addition to serving as one of the first ministers in Andover, he was a vocal opponent of the Salem Witch Trials which led to his family’s persecution by the witch hunters. He was a learned man in a time when few men were, so in addition to his work as a minister, he taught his own children, grandchildren and the children of extended family and friends. During a nearly forty year period, he kept a “commonplace book”, which many educated men of his era used as a place to record quotes they ran across while reading, to draft documents, or in the case of ministers, to draft sermons, and also to record whatever they considered significant. Rev. Dane’s commonplace book, along with one kept by his brother John Dane, are two of the earliest examples of commonplace books in colonial America.

The original copy of Francis Dane’s commonplace book is held by NEHGS, the New England Historical and Genealogical Society. The society has digitized the entire book and made the digital file available free of charge on the internet. I was fascinated by the book. How often do you get to see an object owned by your tenth-great-grandparent, much less actually see his writing and get a glimpse into his mind?

I downloaded all the pages that were intact enough to actually read, and then uploaded the files to Shutterfly so I could create my own hard copy of the book. I now have it, and enjoy trying to puzzle out Rev. Dane’s entries. Handwriting conventions and styles have changed considerably since the 17^th century, as did the English language. I thought I would have no trouble understanding what Francis wrote as long as I could make out his penmanship, but I soon realized my task was far more complex. Seventeenth century English is nearly a foreign language to a 21^st century mind. In addition, Rev. Dane tends to sprinkle Latin phrases amongst the English ones, making accurate transcriptions even more difficult.

Here is part of my transcription of Image 163 from Rev. Dane’s Commonplace book, along with a close-up of the original text.

“How prodigal the world (or worth) of precious times.

How vainly given to pleasures earthly toyes

And letting slide of youth, do years of prime,

Wherein they should seek after heavenly joys

Time’s present moment thus men feast away

As if it would forever on them stay.”

At the very top of the page, you can see a Latin phrase which I have been unable to figure out. The Latin words “momenti” and  “minimum” are pretty clear. I think he is writing something like “momento temporis, minimum momenti magni”, which loosely translates as “a moment of time is of minimal importance” or something like that.

If you examine the next line, you see that my transcription of “how prodigal the” doesn’t really match with the handwriting. He tends to use what looks like “ye” as a shorthand version of “the”. It took quite a bit of puzzling before I figured that out.

The fourth line also exhibits another 17^th century convention: he spells the word “seek” as “seeke”. He adds the letter “e” to many words, often inconsistently. I believe those final e’s were usually silent, but perhaps they were a signal that the word should be pronounced with an extra syllable.

This sample also shows how the use of quill pens creates difficulties for modern readers. He often struck out words or phrases and scribbled corrections in cramped handwriting. Vowels are particularly difficult to tell apart—the ink spreads and obscures the loops of the e’s, o’s and a’s.

While I feel fairly confident that I correctly interpreted the individual words, when the lines are read as complete thoughts, it is hard to understand exactly what he is trying to say. Have I mis-transcribed, or did he simply express things differently than we do now? It is hard to know for certain.

This brief excerpt shows how 17^th century English can almost seem to be a foreign language to a modern reader. I hope that as I become more familiar with his handwriting that I will do a better job at interpreting Rev. Dane’s thoughts.  

Johannes Heinrich Wilhelm “Henry” Hoffman: 52 Ancestors 2020 Prompt “Bearded”

Unusual Beard on a Handsome Face

Johannes Heinrich Wilhelm “Henry” Hoffman: 1836-1906

 

            I have only one confirmed photo of my second-great-grandfather “Henry” Hoffman, and in it he sports the most amazing beard—I’ve never seen one quite like it! While it may have been unusual, the beard didn’t disguise his handsome face and beautiful bone structure.

            Johannes Heinrich Hoffman was born on June 4, 1836 in Odelum, Hanover, Germany. His parents were Freidrich Behrend Hoffman and Maria Christina Uepkendanz. He was one of several children.

            Johannes Heinrich immigrated in 1855 according to the 1900 census. I have been unable to find the records of his departure from Germany or his arrival in the United States. Nor do I know where he first went when he reached America. Did he travel alone at age nineteen, or did he immigrate with a friend or relative?

            By 1860, the United States Census finds him living in Greenfield, Wisconsin. He is married to Sophia Maria Christiane Streu, and he is working as a carpenter. Sophia is 20 to his 24, and according to the census record, she was born in the Michlenburg area of Germany.

            I found the Streu family on the May 1, 1857 departure list for the ship Johannes, leaving the port of Hamburg for New York City. Sophia was 17 years old; her father was fifty. I wonder what motivated a man of his age to uproot his family and sail to America?

            By the 1860 census, Sophia’s parents and two youngest siblings were living in Racine, Wisconsin. Racine is under thirty miles from Greenfield, so the young couple must have met in Wisconsin—perhaps at church or through mutual acquaintances-- and married on October 18, 1859.

            Henry and Sophia had moved their growing family to a farm near Greenfield by the 1870 census. They had five young children by then, and also had Sophia’s younger brother William, age 26, living with them, probably as a laborer on the farm.

            By the 1880 census, the family had moved to a farm near Mankato, Minnesota, where they would live for the rest of their lives. Sophia’s aging parents had moved with them. The older couple were probably helpful with the Hoffmans’ growing family—they had eleven young children by that point, and would go on to have two more before 1884.

            I suspect the photo was taken at some point after the 1880 census, probably around 1885-1888, when Henry would have been in his early fifties, and Sophia was in her late forties. Henry’s amazing beard is white, and the soft waves of his hair are graying. Sophia also appears to be graying, although she may have had fair hair to begin with.

            I love the details in this photo. It appears Henry’s suit pants had been let down at some point—there are two lines above the hem where the fabric had been folded at some point. The suit appears to be a solid wool fabric—I would guess they took great care of it so that it would last for years. Sophia’s dress is the same sober shade as her husband’s suit. The skirt features rows of pintucks, echoed on the bodice of the dress.

            Sophia is a slender woman—you would never guess she gave birth to thirteen children and had nursed them all. Putting on the dress must have taken several minutes, with at least thirteen buttons to fasten. Sophia looks strangely serene and her face is very smooth—no grooves or frown lines reflecting stress or an irritable disposition.

            Henry looks a little more careworn, with his downturned eyes, creased from squinting into the sun while in the fields. He is still a strikingly handsome man, clean-shaven but for that amazing little white beard that falls from the very base of his chin—it appears he shaved beneath his lower lip so the beard was rigidly confined to his chin. It’s a striking look that suits his face.

            I wish I knew more about this amazing couple. Henry died June 21, 1906, less than twenty years after this photo was taken. He was only seventy years old. Sophia lived another sixteen years, dying March 23, 1922. She lived with her youngest son, Edward, and his family in the family home just outside of Mankato.

What Became of Naomi Hull Daniels’ Illegitimate Daughter?

The Mysterious Fate of Naomi's Daughter

Female Child Hull: 1667-?

 

In my previous blog post on my seventh great grandmother Naomi Hull, I noted that Naomi gave birth to an illegitmate child in her twenties around 1667. She was sentenced to be whipped for fornication, and her child was taken away from her. The community of Dover bribed a man named John Church to raise the child and “keep her till she be 20 years old”. On October 3, 1667, Church was granted sixty acres of land if he would take the child with the promise of ten more acres when the girl reached her majority.

So what happened to this child, who would be my seventh-great-aunt?

The child was only identified as “Naemys child”, so we don’t even know her name. There is no further mention of the child in the records. However, there are some hints and clues that paint a possible picture of the child’s fate.

John Church lived in Dover in 1689 when the Dover Massacre or Cochecho Massacre occurred. Natives in the area, bitter after years of poor treatment by colonists, attacked the garrison houses at Dover, killing 23 people. An additional 29 people were taken captive. John Church was one of those captives; it is likely that his home was one of the several buildings the natives set ablaze. While I have been unable to find a full list of the captives, his entire family may have been taken captive, including Naomi’s daughter. She would have been about 22 years old at that point, so might still have been part of the household.

Charles Weygant, in his book The Hull Family in America, posits the following:

 “John Church was captured by Indians in the Dover massacre of 1689, and he was killed and scalped, 7 May 1696, at Cochecho. Among the pupils registered at Quebec was Nimbe II, whom Miss Mary P. Thompson thought to be Naomi Hull [Joseph’s daughter]. Is it not more probable that this was Naomi Hull, the ‘Neamy’s child’ brought up in the family of John Church, named for her mother, and captured with him in 1689?”

It is possible that this captive, turned over to the nuns in Quebec, was Naomi’s child. However, as I pointed out, Naomi’s daughter would have reached the age of 22 by this point, so I question whether she would have been enrolled as a pupil at the convent, unless they took in women as well as children.

We may never know the girl’s fate. I just hope that Naomi was kept apprised of her daughter’s well-being over the years. Life in colonial America was cruel to unwed mothers and illegitimate children.

 

Sources:

The Hull Family in America; Weygant, Charles. Hull Family Assoc., 1913

History of the Town of Durham, New Hampshire : (Oyster River Plantation) with Genealogical Notes; Stackpole, Everett Schermerhorn, 1850-1927; Thompson, Lucien, b. 1859; Meserve, Winthrop Smith, 1838-. Pages 222-223, 235-240.

https://www.dover.nh.gov/government/city-operations/library/history/the-cochecho-massacre.html

https://commonheroes3.wordpress.com/12th-generation/hull-joseph-agnes/

https://www.geni.com/people/Joanna-Davis/6000000001791625198

The Troubled Life of Naomi Hull Daniels: 52 Ancestors 2020 Prompt "Quite the Character"

 The Strange and Sad Life of Naomi Hull Daniels

Naomi Hull: 1640-about 1686

 

My seventh-great-grandmother Naomi Hull Daniels had a troubled life, and ended up causing trouble for her relatives as she grew older. She was quite the character.

Naomi was born sometime in 1640 to Rev. Joseph Hull and his second wife, Agnis Hunt. She was the tenth of Joseph’s sixteen children, and the third child born in America after Rev. Hull had fled England in 1635 seeking religious freedom in Massachusetts.

Unfortunately for the family, Rev. Hull’s preaching ran afoul of the Puritan church that predominated in the first northern colonies. He was forced to repeatedly move his family further north into the wilderness, trying to find a congenial congregation for his ministry. By 1648, Rev. Hull decided that life in the colonies was even worse than the church conflicts he left behind in England. He booked passage on a ship back to England, taking his wife and only a few of their children with him.

I can find no record of Rev. Hull’s return voyage to England, so it is unclear exactly which children accompanied him. Most of the children from Rev. Hull’s first marriage were either grown and out of the house, or were nearly grown. Despite Naomi’s youth, she was left behind. As Rev. Hull’s son in law John Bickford and a neighbor named John Symonds described the situation,

“about four and twenty years ago or there about naomy hulls father and mother they went for England: and left theyer Children to the wid wilderness: and Left them very young and wear not tutred (tutored) as they ought to have been.”

There are some problems with this testimony. The deposition was supposedly given in 1669, so the time period is off by about three years; the Hulls abandoned their children in 1648, which was twenty-one years prior. However, there is no doubt about the basic charge. The description of leaving the children to the “wid wilderness” is heartbreaking. The mention of the children not being “tutred as they ought to have been” shows that the community felt the Hulls’ behavior was out of the ordinary and that they failed to meet basic community standards for parenting. What arrangements did they make for the care of their minor children? Did they expect their eldest children to care for the younger ones? Did the older children agree with this? Did they take in their siblings? How could any parent with a conscience leave behind an eight-year-old child?

17th Century Map of the New Hampshire Colony

We don’t know where poor Naomi was sent when her parents left, but by her teens she was a servant in the home of Samuel Symonds of Ipswich, a former neighbor of her parents. She may have lived with the Symonds family all along since 1648, paying off her room and board with service. Servants had minimal rights; they were treated barely better than slaves, even by supposedly God-fearing Puritans.

She witnessed a deed for her “master” Symonds in April 1661, and had to testify about it in court in June of that year. A few years later, she gave birth to a child out of wedlock, a great scandal in those days. On September 17, 1667, she was “presented for committing fornication, sentence to be whipped to the number of 15 stripes and fees.” What a cruel society! This impoverished, abandoned young woman was whipped and then charged a fine for either being a rape victim or for seeking a few moments’ pleasure to brighten a miserable life. As a servant in someone else’s home, completely at their mercy, she had no chance of paying off the fine.

Having been publicly humiliated, she had little hope of marriage, respect or help. The town saw her and her illegitimate daughter as a problem. As a solution, in 1667 the town bribed a man named John Church of Dover with sixty acres of land if he would agree to take in “Neamys child” and “keep” her until she came of age. Why did they choose this man? Was he the child’s father? If not, why wasn’t the father of the child identified and whipped along with Naomi?

So Naomi lost her child and reputation. In desperation, she moved in with a man named William Williams, Rev. Hull’s former neighbor in Oyster River. The community was offended by this arrangement, so in July 1668 they turned on Williams, ordering the “Constable take of William Williams sinyer (sinner) by way of distress the som of nineteen shillings for a fine for a breach of a town order for entertaining Naomie Hull.”

There is no record of Williams’ reaction to the fine, but shortly afterward Naomi apparently married a man named Davey Daniels. I have found no record of the marriage so the date is uncertain. In fact, there are few records of Davey Daniels prior to the marriage. He appears in tax rolls in 1661, and from 1662-67 jointly with another colonist named Phillip Crommett. He was fined for quarreling in 1664. It is hard to believe he was the father of Naomi’s illegitimate child, for surely he would have raised it himself rather than have another man do so. Davey must not have cared for public opinion, for he chose to marry a fallen woman that the community despised.

The couple lived in the Oyster River/Durham, New Hampshire area and had several children, including my ancestor John Daniels, who was born around 1679. By 1685, Naomi is referred to as the “Widow Daniels”, so Davey must have died around 1685.

Before Davey’s death, Naomi accused her relatives of some amazing crimes. Naomi’s half-sister Dorothy Hull, was about eight years older than Naomi, and had been widowed around the same time Naomi married Davey Daniels. Dorothy married Benjamin Mathews in 1670 and they lived near the Daniels family. It appears the sisters were closer in proximity than emotionally, for on July 4, 1682, the Oyster River Constable was ordered to bring Naomi before the Counsel in Portmouth to face charges of “reproachful and slanderous speeches against Benjamin Mathews and others.”

Two of Naomi’s neighbors testified against her. The first, a young man named Joseph Grafton, stated that when he asked Naomi about her cow that had gone missing, she said that “Wishes and Divells have bewished my cow in the the myer twice.” She identified the witches and devils as her “sister Matt” and “my brother Benjamin Mathes is as bad.” Grafton asked why she was saying such things about relatives. She responded, “Hang them wishes and wizards. Let them Bring me out If they Dare…”

A woman named Remembrance Rand testified that Naomi said “hir sister Mathews was a wizard that her husband was noe better…naomy said that they tould you that it was I did bewich your child, but it was they that did bewich your child, but they did hit to hid their own Rogry…”

It sounds as if Naomi believed some of her neighbors suspected her of witchcraft, so she was turning suspicion onto her sister with whom she obviously had quarreled..

The History of Durham book that quoted the court case did not include the trial’s conclusion. The Salem Witch Trials were still a decade in the future, so perhaps the court did nothing to investigate any sort of rumors of witchcraft.

I feel sorry for Naomi. She must have been emotionally scarred by her parents’ abandonment, her life of servitude, and the community’s disgust at her giving birth to a child out of wedlock. She must have always been whispered about and scorned by her neighbors. Perhaps her own sister was ashamed of her. It is unsurprising she ended up bitter and possibly mentally ill. She must have been quite the character in Oyster River/Durham, New Hampshire.

I have found no record of Naomi’s death or burial. She seems to disappear from records in the late 1680s, so she probably died just a few years after her husband’s death. I hope that in death she found peace from the “Wishes and Divells” that plagued her.

 

Sources:

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Records_and_Files_of_the_Quarterly_Courts_of_Essex_County%2C_Massachusetts%2C_1636-1686 known as EQC.2: 296-297.

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Records_and_Files_of_the_Quarterly_Courts_of_Essex_County%2C_Massachusetts%2C_1636-1686 known as NHPP 40:229

History of Durham, N.H. Prov. Court Files, VI.481.

History of the Town of Durham, New Hampshire : (Oyster River Plantation) with Genealogical Notes; Stackpole, Everett Schermerhorn, 1850-1927; Thompson, Lucien, b. 1859; Meserve, Winthrop Smith, 1838-. Pages 222-223, 235-240.

Craziest Census Transcription Error Ever!

 A Census Transciber Makes A Ridiculous Mistake

Lola Conway Trosdahl: 1891-1947

Wife of First Cousin Once Removed Nels Trosdahl

 

I had to laugh when I looked at the 1940 Census record for Lola Conway Trosdahl, the wife of my first cousin once removed Nels Trosdahl. Whoever transcribed that census page for Ancestry either had extremely poor eyesight, or was trying to be amusing. In 1940, Lola was a fifty-year-old woman living separately from her husband. She was a lodger in the home of a man named John Baldwin, who was a laborer on road construction projects, so not a wealthy man by any means.

According to the transcription, Lola was employed as a “carpenter” for “Two Grand Underwear”. I was agog. A fifty-year-old female carpenter in northern Minnesota in 1940? It seemed unlikely. And what in the world was “Two Grand Underwear”? Some bizarre underwear manufacturing company? Why did they need a female carpenter?

I pulled up the actual image of the census record. The census taker’s penmanship was neat and quite legible, and Lola’s entry did not include any of the information provided in the transcription.

So what was Lola’s occupation? She was an unpaid “caretaker”—other than the words “caretaker” and “carpenter” both starting with “car-“ and ending with “-er”, they are quite distinct visually, so I can’t explain the transcription error. And Lola’s workplace had nothing to do with underwear. The census taker quite clearly wrote the words “two grandchildren”.

The household included two of John Baldwin’s grandchildren, both toddlers. Lola was their caretaker—today we’d probably say she was their nanny.

I would think that transcriptionists have editors. How did this egregiously ridiculous mistake slip past? Lola probably would have preferred doing carpentry work for Two Grand Underwear—it was bound to have paid better than the room and board she was receiving from the Baldwin family.

Lola’s life provided one other interesting and tragic piece of information. She married her husband, Nels Alfred Trosdahl on December 29, 1905. Since she was born in July 1891,that means she was a 14 year old bride. Nels Trosdahl was 22. Lola gave birth to their first child, Myrtle, barely five months later in May 1906, so she was nearly four months pregnant at the time of the marriage. Nels is fortunate that 1905 was a kinder time for pedophiles—Lola was a child! He was eight years older and an adult—he took advantage of her. What a sad, miserable life she must have led—Nels was a poor provider who worked as a farm laborer on other people’s land. Lord knows how they managed to support five daughters.

Lola died in 1947 at age 55. She was probably just worn out from a lifetime of labor and stress.

An Early Halloween Tale: Walking on Philip Cox's Grave

Halloween Appropriate Story: Walking on Philip Cox’s Grave
 
Philip Cox: 1677-1736

 

Years ago, when someone experienced a sudden chill that made them shiver, they would say that either a cat or “someone” had “walked over their grave”. The phrase meant that someone had stepped on the ground where they would eventually be buried. Poor Philip Cox must have been shivering for decades in his grave, as his headstone ended up as part of someone’s front walk where people stepped on it daily!

Philip Cox was the husband of my first cousin eight-times-removed Dorcas Hull. Philip was born in England in 1677 to a merchant tailor named Isaac Cox. He immigrated to New Jersey sometime before 1700, marrying Dorcas Hull before 1702. The couple had at least six children, and owned a sizable farm in Middlesex, New Jersey.

Philip died July 12 or 13, 1736. He left a decent estate, including money and land which was divided between his surviving sons Philip Jr. and Phineas. The family apparently buried Philip on the Cox farm in a family burial ground rather than in a dedicated cemetery. This would help to explain what happened to his headstone years later, after his descendants had sold the farm:

“In 1947 Charles C. Gardner, a genealogist, recorded this information about his tombstone:

 ‘On the farm of Mr. Thomas at Springdale, on N. side of road from Warrenville to Martinsville in use as part of a walk by kitchen door: philup cox July ye 12 1736.’”

I surmise that Mr. Thomas was the most recent owner of the old Cox family property, and lacking all respect for the graves of the Cox family, made use of the headstones as stepping stones near his kitchen door.

Three years later in 1950, Philip Cox’s fifth-great-granddaughter Grace Hendrickson Riddle, “discovered his marker in the sidewalk at the Fred Dilzell house, 155 Washington Valley Road. After chalking the inscription, she took the picture shown here, the only one known to exist.” Sadly, I have been unable to find the referenced photo.

Less than a decade later, the stone had either been removed or had become so worn that it was no longer identifiable as a headstone, for subsequent efforts to find it failed.

I find it rather horrifying that the people in this town had so little respect for the dead that they could stomp over a headstone every day without a single qualm. Even if Mr. Cox was not one of their ancestors, the dead deserve more respect.

With the stone being hauled around for use in at least two households’ walkways, the actual location of the grave was obviously lost. Who knows how many people are unknowingly walking over Philip Cox’s grave every day? Or how many cars are driving over him?  The blog embersoftheflame.com, run by Steve Cox, provided more information on the possible location of Philip Cox’s remains:

“According to Crane, there were tombstone inscriptions made by Charles Gardner in 1947. One read, “Philup Cox, July, ye 12, 1736.” The second one read, “In memory of Philip Cox who died Sept 19, 1785, aged 80 years.” Two witnesses remembered seeing the stones, Mrs Hazel Mundy and Donald Freiday. Mrs. Munday believed the stones were originally back to back, and that the cemetery was probably on the north bank of the Mountain Boulevard Extension at the intersection with 155 Washington Valley Road. The tombstones have disappeared, and Crane discovered that local people believe the cemetery is buried underneath Mountain Boulevard Extension. This would be the most likely place to find the property where Phillip was living at his death.”

Map of Mountain Blvd. Extension--Cox Burial Ground Likely beneath the road

So poor Philip and any other members of his family who were unfortunate enough to be buried in the Cox Burial Ground are probably beneath a freeway entrance in Warren, New Jersey. There is no indication that the burials were properly removed and reinterred during construction of the road. Since the headstones had already been removed by community members before the road construction occurred, the construction company may have had no idea that they were digging through a family cemetery. While his grave is lost, at least Philip will be remembered as part of my family tree.

 

Sources:

PHILLIP COX FAMILY AMONG EARLIEST SETTLERS IN "THE BLUE HILLS"[From Warren History Vol Two, No. 8, Fall 1997]  http://warrennj.org/wths/cox2.htm  

https://embersoftheflame.com/jacob-cox-1727-1809/jacobs-ancestors/phillip-and-dorcas-hull-cox/-cox/