Polly Daniels Randall: 1774-1851
Samuel Daniels:1733-1823
My fourth
great-grandmother Polly Randall was a bit of a mystery. I only had records for
her following her marriage to my fourth great-grandfather Israel Randall. I
believed her maiden name was Daniels, but who exactly were her parents, and how
could I verify that any potential parentage was correct? She had lived in Vermont,
but I could find no birth records for her. Did that mean she was born
elsewhere? Census data from that era did not list any family names other than
the head of the household. So what records could I find? To my delight, a
search of Vermont’s probate records produced a will that settled my Polly
Randall quandary once and for all.
Polly
Daniels was born April 5, 1774 in Rockingham County, New Hampshire to parents
Samuel and Elizabeth Noble Daniels. She was the seventh of their twelve
children who survived to adulthood. I have found no record of her marriage to
Israel Randall; they married at some point before their daughter Sally Randall
was born in 1792. They had one other surviving child, Israel Randall Jr., born
in 1806.
Polly’s
father wrote a will in 1808. By that time, all his daughters were married and
out of the house, and all the sons but one had moved away and started families
of their own. Only son Abram, the youngest son, still lived at home with his
parents, along with his wife and children.
"To my daughter Polley Randal one Cow." |
According to the will, written in 1808, Polly and her five sisters were to receive one cow apiece. Five of their six brothers were to receive the paltry sum of $2 apiece, except for one lucky brother, Abram, who was the recipient of the bulk of Samuel’s real estate and farm implements, and part of the house. In addition, Samuel’s “beloved wife Elizabeth” was to inherit one third of the estate and would have a life interest in half of the family home—the easterly half, to be precise. Abram would be residing in the other half of the house.
Will provisions for beloved wife and fortunate son Abram |
Abram, the youngest of Samuel’s sons, was also named as executor of Samuel’s estate, and was given the task of distributing the bequests to his siblings and mother. This raises so many questions. According to the additional probate documents, the farm was eventually sold at auction for $1100, so the disparity between what Abram was to receive and what his siblings received was quite dramatic. How did the others feel about this “favorite son”? How did Abram feel about his father’s plans? The will wasn’t a secret in the family; two of Samuel’s other sons, John and Solomon, had witnessed the will. I would imagine there was a certain amount of bitterness at the way the property was distributed, unless Samuel had provided the other five sons with money or property when they reached their majority and started their own homes.
Whatever the terms of the will,
fate made them irrelevant. Samuel had been intent on providing for the care of
his wife after his death, but on December 11, 1808, just months after he wrote
the will, Elizabeth died.
Shockingly, the favored youngest
son Abram also died less than five years later, on March 20, 1813. He was only
35, and one record mentions he died “of a sudden”. This would indicate a sudden
event like a stroke or heart attack.
Abram's headstone in Vermont |
Obviously Samuel should have
written a new will following these tragedies, but apparently he failed to do
so. When he died on May 25, 1823, his estate went to probate, but little was
done for nearly two years. The only copy of the 1808 will had apparently been
carried to Canada by Samuel’s eldest son Solomon when he emigrated to Quebec with
his family. Once the will was located, the probate court was forced to send an
attorney to Quebec to retrieve the document and get an affidavit from Solomon,
who was one of the will witnesses, as to its authenticity. The attorney then
had to travel back to Vermont, a trip that probably took weeks. He presented
the will to the court in 1825, two long years after Samuel’s death.
Since the son Samuel wanted to be
executor was dead, the court appointed a new executor, who appraised the
property, including 112 acres of land, at $1409.
Assets of Samuel's estate |
There were also claims or
debts against the estate, including an $860 claim from Abram Daniels’ estate.
Since the will had given the bulk of the property to Abram and his heirs, this
apparently comprised his heirs share.
Claims against Samuel's estate |
The executor auctioned off Samuel’s
farm for $1,100; the buyer was a man called Stevens. Where did Abram’s widow
and children go? Were they still living in Samuel’s house? Was the house
included as part of the farm sale, or was it part of the property Abram’s
estate claimed? It isn’t clear from the probate files.
Following
the sale, the executor distributed the proceeds. He paid out the “legacies” of
$2 apiece for the five sons. In addition, he spent $15 per daughter to provide
for the one-cow-per-daughter legacy. It isn’t clear if he gave each woman the
cash equivalent of a cow, or if he actually purchased six cows at $15 each, and
presented them with the animals. Surely some of the women did not live on
farms; how could they provide for a cow? I just imagine them answering a knock
on the door to find a man with a cow standing outside. Once again, the five
surviving sons must have felt a little hurt by the contrast between their
sisters’ $15-per-person inheritance and their measly two dollars.
Samuel’s will
leaves me with a lot of intriguing questions, but it settled one thing for
certain: Polly Daniels Randall’s parentage. Since Samuel carefully listed each
of his six daughters’ married names in the will, I know for certain that the
woman in my family tree known as Polly Randall was indeed the daughter of
Samuel and Elizabeth Noble Daniels, and the sibling to eleven other Daniels
children.
Where there’s a will, there’s a
way…to verify parentage!
No comments:
Post a Comment